在这个世界上有一群身怀特异功能的人，影片主要讲述了有三种特异功能的人，通过某种方式预知或查知过去的“观察者”；能够意念移物的“移物者”，操纵别人思想，将自己编织的意念注入别人脑中的“思想者”。世界各国包括美国政府将这些拥有异能的人抓进一个叫隔离区的地方，通过吸取他们的超能力，然后注入普通人的体内，使得普通人也能拥有超能力，这样试验成功的话，就可以打造一支无敌的超级军队。为此，他们在各地寻找拥有异能的人来做实验，一次偶然的机会，一个被抓的异能者顺利的逃出了隔离区，同时她还顺手偷出了一支含有异能液的注射器，将其藏在一个箱子里，然后来到了香港。同时隔离区派来特工抓捕这名逃跑者,同时找回丢失的异能液。 　　 主人公尼克（克里斯·埃文斯饰）的父亲也是一名异能者，为隔离区工作，但是为了自己以及自己的家庭，他叛逃了。随后被隔离区特工追捕，在被隔离区特工抓去之前，告诉他的儿子尼克以后碰到一个送他花的女孩，就尽力帮助她。流落到香港的尼克，终于在一次赌博失败后送她花的女孩出现了，凯西·霍尔蒙斯（达科塔·范宁饰），一个“观察”者。她通过预知未来知道只有在尼克的帮助下才能得到这个装有异能液的箱子，尼克此时也想起了父亲的嘱托，于是他寻找了一批流落到香港的异能者一块来打败隔离区派来的特工，以夺取箱子。同时香港政府的异能特工也发现了这个箱子，希望能得到它。于是三方势力为了争夺这个箱子展开了生死的争夺……

几位热爱打排球的年轻人——King（顾定轩饰）、Bobby（卢瀚霆饰）、阿柠（邱傲然饰）、方丈（柳应廷饰）、阿神（吕爵安饰）— 因为身高问题而被“翔鹰”排球队的教练放弃。他们偶然遇上排球梦碎的香港女子排球代表队的前队员蒋家瑜（邓丽欣饰），并以热血、活力再次唤醒家瑜的“排球魂”，令她成为香港男子排球史上第一位女教练。
排球队其后招募新人加入，当中包括潜质优厚的鱼仔（陈卓贤饰）。四年间，家瑜和“力图”排球队一起经历各种考验，在挫折中互相成长。家瑜亦尝试走出当年因受伤而退队的阴影，重燃当职业排球员的梦想。当年被看不起的“力图”排球队，创造出一个又一个的“小传奇”，更从排球联赛的丙组，晋身成联赛甲组冠军！他们用行动告诉大家，“We are the Littles”（我们不高），但别小看我们！
本剧创作灵感为香港男子排球队“力臻”由丙组联赛晋身至甲一联赛的故事。

年轻漂亮的左兰本是个纯洁善良的女孩，有着相恋多年的男友。因为父亲嗜赌成性，被追债的过程中左兰惨遭凌辱。本以为对自己不离不弃的男友，却为了自己上位将左兰送上老板的床，左兰心如死灰。九龙寨的老大罪哥，救下了想轻生的左兰，左兰为了报复毁掉自己人生的人，决心跟随罪哥，在罪哥的一次次历练中，左兰手刃九龙寨叛徒，成长为名副其实的江湖大嫂。
左兰接手九龙寨生意后，设计杀死贪污黑警和所有伤害过自己的人，大仇得报。跟随罪哥多年的手下陈杰，暗恋着左兰，看到左兰的变化，内心痛苦，想劝她回头。罪哥在弥留之际想正式传位于左兰，并告知陈杰是警方卧底。此刻香港廉政公署已着手清理九龙寨，外忧内患，左兰将如何抉择······

祖是一位非常平凡的会计员，明天是他跟Shirley往教堂 举行婚礼的大喜日子，可谁也没想到就在这一晚会发生惊心动魄的事……

阿基 (劉澤源飾演) 中學畢業後在快餐店打工，存了幾年錢，希望可以繼續讀大學。加拿大方面通知阿基可入讀第十三班，本已答應借三萬元給他的中學老友突然爽約，而做打鐵師傅的兄長又結婚在即，沒錢借他，做渡輪水手的父親 (孫季卿飾演) 年事已高，是那種話不多說，愛在心裏不表達的典型父親。雖然父親反對阿基留學，還是問人借來了三萬元，讓兒子完成夢想。
演員：劉澤源、孫季卿、黎萱、江譽聖、余世騰
導演：黎略
監製：黃敬強

星星的孩子—猶如天上的星星，一人一世界，獨自閃爍。
自閉症孩子在與人相處和學習上，因表現有別於一般人，往往遇上別人不能理解的情況。社會上仍然有很多人對自閉兒缺乏認識，這群孩子在成長路上屢受挫折，甚至擁有潛能亦未能發揮。不管如何努力，似乎總有一道牆把他們和世界隔開了。正如主題曲的第一句：「真切對話，就能掉低框架」，希望透過節目能喚起大眾對自閉兒的關心，也為這群孩子的父母們打氣，讓他們在這段漫長的路上不再感覺孤單無力。另一方面，希望企業或機構能創造更多資助及就業機會，協助自閉人士融入社會。我們深信天生我才必有用。

The drama depicts a jury forced to consider a homicide trial. At the beginning, they have a nearly unanimous decision of guilty, with a single dissenter of not-guilty, who throughout the play sows a seed of reasonable doubt. The story begins after closing arguments have been presented in the homicide case, as the judge is giving his instructions to the jury. As in most American criminal cases, the twelve men must unanimously decide on a verdict of "guilty" or "not guilty". (In the justice systems of nearly all American states, failure to reach a unanimous verdict, a so-called "hung jury", results in a mistrial.) The case at hand pertains to whether a young man murdered his own father. The jury is further instructed that a guilty verdict will be accompanied by a mandatory death sentence. These twelve then move to the jury room, where they begin to become acquainted with the personalities of their peers. Throughout their deliberation, not a single juror calls another by his name because the names are unknown by the jurors. Several of the jurors have different reasons for discriminating against the witness: his race, his background, and the troubled relationship between one juror and his own son.
一名少年被控謀殺父親。法庭內，樓下老伯作供聲稱親耳聽到他大罵「我要殺死你」；對街女人作供聲稱親眼目睹他以刀刺進父親胸口；雜貨店老闆作供聲稱曾售賣兇器予少年。似乎，被判死刑將會是他的結局。
陪審團由十二位素未謀面的人組成，聽畢審訊退庭商議。無論陪審團作出任何裁決，必須一致。看似定局已成的判決由於其中一人的異議而爆發成激烈的爭論。十二名陪審員將如何決定少年的生死？

The drama depicts a jury forced to consider a homicide trial. At the beginning, they have a nearly unanimous decision of guilty, with a single dissenter of not-guilty, who throughout the play sows a seed of reasonable doubt. The story begins after closing arguments have been presented in the homicide case, as the judge is giving his instructions to the jury. As in most American criminal cases, the twelve men must unanimously decide on a verdict of "guilty" or "not guilty". (In the justice systems of nearly all American states, failure to reach a unanimous verdict, a so-called "hung jury", results in a mistrial.) The case at hand pertains to whether a young man murdered his own father. The jury is further instructed that a guilty verdict will be accompanied by a mandatory death sentence. These twelve then move to the jury room, where they begin to become acquainted with the personalities of their peers. Throughout their deliberation, not a single juror calls another by his name because the names are unknown by the jurors. Several of the jurors have different reasons for discriminating against the witness: his race, his background, and the troubled relationship between one juror and his own son.
一名少年被控謀殺父親。法庭內，樓下老伯作供聲稱親耳聽到他大罵「我要殺死你」；對街女人作供聲稱親眼目睹他以刀刺進父親胸口；雜貨店老闆作供聲稱曾售賣兇器予少年。似乎，被判死刑將會是他的結局。
陪審團由十二位素未謀面的人組成，聽畢審訊退庭商議。無論陪審團作出任何裁決，必須一致。看似定局已成的判決由於其中一人的異議而爆發成激烈的爭論。十二名陪審員將如何決定少年的生死？

The drama depicts a jury forced to consider a homicide trial. At the beginning, they have a nearly unanimous decision of guilty, with a single dissenter of not-guilty, who throughout the play sows a seed of reasonable doubt. The story begins after closing arguments have been presented in the homicide case, as the judge is giving his instructions to the jury. As in most American criminal cases, the twelve men must unanimously decide on a verdict of "guilty" or "not guilty". (In the justice systems of nearly all American states, failure to reach a unanimous verdict, a so-called "hung jury", results in a mistrial.) The case at hand pertains to whether a young man murdered his own father. The jury is further instructed that a guilty verdict will be accompanied by a mandatory death sentence. These twelve then move to the jury room, where they begin to become acquainted with the personalities of their peers. Throughout their deliberation, not a single juror calls another by his name because the names are unknown by the jurors. Several of the jurors have different reasons for discriminating against the witness: his race, his background, and the troubled relationship between one juror and his own son.
一名少年被控謀殺父親。法庭內，樓下老伯作供聲稱親耳聽到他大罵「我要殺死你」；對街女人作供聲稱親眼目睹他以刀刺進父親胸口；雜貨店老闆作供聲稱曾售賣兇器予少年。似乎，被判死刑將會是他的結局。
陪審團由十二位素未謀面的人組成，聽畢審訊退庭商議。無論陪審團作出任何裁決，必須一致。看似定局已成的判決由於其中一人的異議而爆發成激烈的爭論。十二名陪審員將如何決定少年的生死？