ai

<p>&quot;Vibe-coded build system NX gets hacked, steals vibe-coders’ crypto&quot;: <a href="https://pivot-to-ai.com/2025/08/29/vibe-coded-build-system-nx-gets-hacked-steals-vibe-coders-crypto/" rel="nofollow" class="ellipsis" title="pivot-to-ai.com/2025/08/29/vibe-coded-build-system-nx-gets-hacked-steals-vibe-coders-crypto/"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">pivot-to-ai.com/2025/08/29/vib</span><span class="invisible">e-coded-build-system-nx-gets-hacked-steals-vibe-coders-crypto/</span></a></p><p>As someone who spent time in infosec and then more time infosec adjacent, this was painful to read. </p><p>1400 folks got hit on this, that is not huge but it sure ain&#x27;t small either. This will not be the last and it will not be the biggest. </p><p><a href="/tags/ai/" rel="tag">#ai</a></p>

<p><a href="/tags/ai/" rel="tag">#AI</a> 是一面镜子，你以为在跟他说话，其实不过是 <a href="/tags/自言自语/" rel="tag">#自言自语</a> 。</p>

<p>很高兴看到公众对 deepseek 项目背后诸多技术资本和统治贵族之间阴暗且密切的关系的揭示。我们不会反对技术进步，只要技术进步可以造福人类，让我们不再辛劳，不再为了温饱而忍受剥削压榨，不再因人类肉身的局限性而不得不放弃自由的梦想委身于统治。</p><p>但是，当技术被掌握着法西斯手里时，我们所期待的一切不仅都无法实现，更将导致我们已经熟悉的噩梦变本加厉。它绝不可持续。</p><p>帝国冷战和民族主义的价值判断是本阶段你能遇到的最愚蠢的烟雾。扫清它们，才能看到你我的未来 - 那里不应再有它们的存在。</p><p>希望本文能为华人反抗者带来提示。</p><p>🧬 更新《斩断AI法西斯主义》<br><a href="https://iyouport.notion.site/AI-19034ca2d46d804893acd4f301a76498" rel="nofollow" class="ellipsis" title="iyouport.notion.site/AI-19034ca2d46d804893acd4f301a76498"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">iyouport.notion.site/AI-19034c</span><span class="invisible">a2d46d804893acd4f301a76498</span></a></p><p>—— 📌 借此周知：本项目一期工程增补了一个新的栏目，将从理论原理和战术技巧等多方面讲述这场二十一世纪最重要的战斗如何与您密切相关：尤其是，您可以借助的机会和使用的武器。</p><p>这场战斗对中美两国至关重要，且只对这两国最重要；正如华语朋友在我们年初动员期间的讨论中所提到的；「这个世界的秩序正在变成两个法西斯之间的对峙、平衡、协调和合作， …… 华人Antifa的崛起将成为我们翻身的起点。」</p><p>希望本栏目能有助于更多华语地区的进步人士补充洞察力，并提升战斗力。</p><p>该栏目才刚开启，后续将有更多重要内容进入。如果您准备复制本数据库，可晚些再操作。<br>（本项目未来还将有一个单独讨论战术问题的专题站点，而将要收录在本栏目中的战术原理会具有一定的针对性。）</p><p><a href="/tags/高堡奇人/" rel="tag">#高堡奇人</a> <a href="/tags/china/" rel="tag">#China</a> <a href="/tags/usa/" rel="tag">#USA</a> <a href="/tags/ai/" rel="tag">#AI</a> <a href="/tags/法西斯/" rel="tag">#法西斯</a> <a href="/tags/fascism/" rel="tag">#fascism</a> <a href="/tags/resistance/" rel="tag">#resistance</a> <a href="/tags/tactics/" rel="tag">#tactics</a> <a href="/tags/initiatives/" rel="tag">#initiatives</a></p>

<p>&quot;Duolingo will “gradually stop using contractors to do work that Al can handle,” according to an all-hands email sent by co-founder and CEO Luis von Ahn announcing that the company will be “AI-first.”&quot;</p><p><a href="https://www.theverge.com/news/657594/duolingo-ai-first-replace-contract-workers" rel="nofollow" class="ellipsis" title="www.theverge.com/news/657594/duolingo-ai-first-replace-contract-workers"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">www.theverge.com/news/657594/d</span><span class="invisible">uolingo-ai-first-replace-contract-workers</span></a></p><p><a href="/tags/news/" rel="tag">#news</a> <a href="/tags/technews/" rel="tag">#TechNews</a> <a href="/tags/technology/" rel="tag">#technology</a> <a href="/tags/workers/" rel="tag">#workers</a> <a href="/tags/labor/" rel="tag">#labor</a> <a href="/tags/ai/" rel="tag">#AI</a> <a href="/tags/jobs/" rel="tag">#jobs</a></p>

<p>&quot;[...] there are approximately 1.5 billion Windows users worldwide, which means just over 1% of them are using Copilot, a tool that&#x27;s now a Windows default app.&quot;</p><p><a href="https://www.xda-developers.com/microsofts-huge-venture-flatlines/" rel="nofollow" class="ellipsis" title="www.xda-developers.com/microsofts-huge-venture-flatlines/"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">www.xda-developers.com/microso</span><span class="invisible">fts-huge-venture-flatlines/</span></a></p><p><a href="/tags/news/" rel="tag">#news</a> <a href="/tags/technews/" rel="tag">#TechNews</a> <a href="/tags/technology/" rel="tag">#technology</a> <a href="/tags/ai/" rel="tag">#AI</a> <a href="/tags/microsoft/" rel="tag">#microsoft</a> <a href="/tags/copilot/" rel="tag">#copilot</a></p>

<p>&quot;Children shouldn’t speak with companion chatbots because such interactions risk self harm and could exacerbate mental health problems and addiction.&quot;</p><p><a href="https://themarkup.org/artificial-intelligence/2025/04/30/kids-should-avoid-ai-companion-bots-under-force-of-law-assessment-says" rel="nofollow" class="ellipsis" title="themarkup.org/artificial-intelligence/2025/04/30/kids-should-avoid-ai-companion-bots-under-force-of-law-assessment-says"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">themarkup.org/artificial-intel</span><span class="invisible">ligence/2025/04/30/kids-should-avoid-ai-companion-bots-under-force-of-law-assessment-says</span></a></p><p><a href="/tags/technology/" rel="tag">#technology</a> <a href="/tags/ai/" rel="tag">#ai</a> <a href="/tags/mentalhealth/" rel="tag">#MentalHealth</a></p>

<p>Katarzyna Nowaczyk-Basińska, a research fellow at the Leverhulme Center for the Future of Intelligence at the University of Cambridge, explores how new technologies like &quot;AI&quot; chatbots are reshaping our understanding of death, loss and grief.</p><p><a href="https://www.scientificamerican.com/podcast/episode/griefbots-create-digital-immortality-and-raise-ethical-concerns-around-ai/" rel="nofollow" class="ellipsis" title="www.scientificamerican.com/podcast/episode/griefbots-create-digital-immortality-and-raise-ethical-concerns-around-ai/"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">www.scientificamerican.com/pod</span><span class="invisible">cast/episode/griefbots-create-digital-immortality-and-raise-ethical-concerns-around-ai/</span></a></p><p><a href="/tags/technology/" rel="tag">#technology</a> <a href="/tags/ai/" rel="tag">#ai</a> <a href="/tags/griefbots/" rel="tag">#griefbots</a></p>

<p>人類喜歡絞盡腦汁地用錯誤的答案來回應錯誤的問題。</p><p>例如用 AI 來協助撰寫（難以閱讀的）公文，然後用 AI 來協助讀懂（難以閱讀的）公文內容。</p><p><a href="/tags/ai/" rel="tag">#AI</a> <a href="/tags/accessibility/" rel="tag">#accessibility</a></p>

I read <span class="h-card"><a href="https://toot.cafe/@baldur" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>baldur</span></a></span>&#x27;s post Let&#x27;s stop pretending that managers and executives care about productivity today, here: <a href="https://www.baldurbjarnason.com/2025/disingenuous-discourse/" rel="nofollow" class="ellipsis" title="www.baldurbjarnason.com/2025/disingenuous-discourse/"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">www.baldurbjarnason.com/2025/d</span><span class="invisible">isingenuous-discourse/</span></a> and felt like riffing a bit on the section &quot;Task sequences as vectors&quot; since I&#x27;ve modeled stuff like this too. As with baldur&#x27;s post mine is a bit of a gallop, meaning I might make some errors and omissions. The tl;dr is that this model suggests that in many workplaces, mandating AI tool use might have the perverse effect of making the group or workplace less productive overall, even if the tools make individuals more productive (as measured by unit throughput, say).<br><br>The rough idea is to model a bunch of people working in a company using queuing theory. Each person receives tasks to perform, completes each task in sequence, and passes the result onto another person. If a person is busy when they receive a new task, the task goes into a sort of inbox to wait till they&#x27;re ready to work on it (the &quot;queue&quot; in &quot;queuing theory&quot;). Each person is modeled as a probability distribution, where the mean specifies the average or typical amount of time they take to complete a task, and the variance models the fact that sometimes tasks take more or less time to complete for unaccounted for reasons (you spill your coffee; the previous person did a bang up job that time; etc). You can model workplaces with many people, like factories and offices, in this way, and ask questions about how quickly the entire group can complete tasks (throughput, which relates to productivity), how much time passes between an initial incoming request and the output of a final product (latency or wait time), and how much variability there is in the throughput and latency. It&#x27;s mathmagical!<br><br>Anyhow, baldur points out that the variance in individual task completion is the killer variable here. As you introduce more and more variability in the time-to-complete distribution of individuals, the group&#x27;s throughput and latency suffer significantly. Depending of course on the structure of the group, there can be phase shifts from &quot;throughput decreases&quot; to &quot;throughput effectively stops altogether&quot; as this variability goes up. He argues, I think correctly, that forcing workers to use generative AI tools in their workflows can increase their task completion time variance. Even worse, even if it does make their individual throughput higher--meaning the tools locally &quot;increase productivity&quot;--an increase in the variance of that throughput can make the overall productivity of the workplace lower despite what seem to be individual gains! A manager that actually did care about productivity would at the very least consider this possibility before mandating the use of such tools.<br><br>I wanted to add that these sorts of phenomena can be even worse depending on how you model time-to-complete. Often a Gaussian distribution (bell curve) is used, reflecting that sometimes tasks can be completed faster and sometimes they take a bit more time, but tend to an average and do not skew towards faster or slower. This is largely the model baldur was discussing. However, knowledge work, and especially work like coding or R&amp;D, are often better modeled by exponential distributions or similarly long-tailed distributions like the gamma distribution. With knowledge work, most tasks are completed in an average-ish amount of time, occasionally some are completed more quickly, but more often there are tasks that take 2, 3, sometimes 10 or more times as long as the average case. For the exponential distribution, roughly 5% of tasks take an &quot;anomalously&quot; long time.<br><br>A sequence of exponentially-distributed tasks has challenging throughput and latency behavior. The sum of independent exponential distributions is a gamma distribution, which is also long-tailed but usually with an even worse rate parameter that tends to lengthen the tail, meaning delays compound (in baldur&#x27;s post delays tend to be compensated by symmetrical gains if the group is large enough, but that doesn&#x27;t happen with long-tailed distributions). I don&#x27;t know enough about queuing theory to say what the general behavior is, but intuitively it seems it must be equally challenging in real-world arrangements. This is one way to account for why software development projects and R&amp;D projects are almost never completed early and can sometimes take 2 or more times longer than anticipated.<br><br>Adding variance to an exponential distribution--as mandated use of AI tools might do--has the effect of also increasing the mean time to completion. It also flattens/lengthens the tail. I haven&#x27;t worked it out for other long-tailed distributions but I suspect similar phenomena with those. Overall this would be going in the wrong direction, making the killer problem--the long tail--even worse!<br><br><a href="/tags/ai/" rel="tag">#AI</a> <a href="/tags/genai/" rel="tag">#GenAI</a> <a href="/tags/generativeai/" rel="tag">#GenerativeAI</a> <a href="/tags/llm/" rel="tag">#LLM</a> <a href="/tags/aimandates/" rel="tag">#AIMandates</a> <a href="/tags/queuingtheory/" rel="tag">#QueuingTheory</a> <a href="/tags/modeling/" rel="tag">#modeling</a> <a href="/tags/workplacemodeling/" rel="tag">#WorkplaceModeling</a> <a href="/tags/productivity/" rel="tag">#productivity</a><br>

<p><a href="https://open.substack.com/pub/blueamp/p/sit-abc-news-sit-good-dog?r=j0lyx&amp;utm_campaign=post&amp;utm_medium=web&amp;showWelcomeOnShare=true" rel="nofollow" class="ellipsis" title="open.substack.com/pub/blueamp/p/sit-abc-news-sit-good-dog?r=j0lyx&amp;utm_campaign=post&amp;utm_medium=web&amp;showWelcomeOnShare=true"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">open.substack.com/pub/blueamp/</span><span class="invisible">p/sit-abc-news-sit-good-dog?r=j0lyx&amp;utm_campaign=post&amp;utm_medium=web&amp;showWelcomeOnShare=true</span></a><br>NEW SUBSTACK (Check it out/Subscribe!): A moment that defines our time. From Trump’s aggressive lying to the lack of pushback/weakness from Terry Moran &amp; ABC’s corporate entanglements.</p><p>Also: David Shuster video (Hilarious!). NYT Pitchbot (Hilarious!). <a href="/tags/news/" rel="tag">#news</a> <a href="/tags/usa/" rel="tag">#usa</a> <a href="/tags/politics/" rel="tag">#politics</a> <a href="/tags/russia/" rel="tag">#russia</a> <a href="/tags/ukraine/" rel="tag">#ukraine</a> <a href="/tags/press/" rel="tag">#press</a> <a href="/tags/us/" rel="tag">#us</a> <a href="/tags/america/" rel="tag">#america</a> <a href="/tags/unitedstates/" rel="tag">#unitedstates</a> <a href="/tags/tech/" rel="tag">#tech</a> <a href="/tags/china/" rel="tag">#china</a> <a href="/tags/tariffs/" rel="tag">#tariffs</a> <a href="/tags/stockmarket/" rel="tag">#stockmarket</a> <a href="/tags/donaldtrump/" rel="tag">#donaldtrump</a> <a href="/tags/trump/" rel="tag">#trump</a> <a href="/tags/press/" rel="tag">#press</a> <a href="/tags/media/" rel="tag">#media</a> <a href="/tags/podcast/" rel="tag">#podcast</a> <a href="/tags/eu/" rel="tag">#eu</a> <a href="/tags/ai/" rel="tag">#ai</a> <a href="/tags/canada/" rel="tag">#canada</a> <a href="/tags/europe/" rel="tag">#europe</a> <a href="/tags/nato/" rel="tag">#nato</a></p>

Please stop saying &quot;AI powered&quot;. It&#x27;s a mixed-up way to talk that allows for a lot of mischief:<br><br>1. It&#x27;s a mixed metaphor. AI is reactive, not propulsive (think through what the word &quot;power&quot; means)<br>2. AI is a mixed bag of a large number of different technologies, making the term imprecise at best (&quot;AI&quot; in video games frequently leans on old school A*, quite different from the LLMs that make the news)<br>3. LLM-based AI mixes up other people&#x27;s words into a slurry that is full of content-free phrases like &quot;AI powered&quot;. Why ape that?<br><br><a href="/tags/ai/" rel="tag">#AI</a> <a href="/tags/genai/" rel="tag">#GenAI</a> <a href="/tags/generativeai/" rel="tag">#GenerativeAI</a><br>

My half-baked deep thought of the day is that we are living through a time in which imagination has been de-legitimatized generally, and we are reaching the necessarily absurd crescendo of this process. It is taking physical form in technologies such as generative AI, literal Anti-Imagination generators.<br><br>Let me be clear what I (don&#x27;t) mean by &quot;imagination&quot;. I do not mean &quot;creative&quot;, &quot;fictional&quot;, &quot;imaginary&quot;, or &quot;artistic&quot;--those words can be related, but they&#x27;ve also been co-opted into exactly the trend I&#x27;m calling out. I also don&#x27;t mean interesting images that appear in your mind or dreams but are then dismissed as lacking significance. I do mean truly imaginative acts arising within and from the mind, and not subjected to editorial scrutiny by logic, empiricism, or other instrumentalized forms of reason. Dreams are one way to access imagination; active imagination--stream of consciousness directed but not edited by the conscious mind--can be a way to explore it. Religious, magical, mystical, or meditative practices can too if that&#x27;s your jam. So can psychoanalysis and some other forms of therapy. There are countless other ways and I don&#x27;t pretend to have any special knowledge of this, I&#x27;m just riffing on an idea.<br><br>More and more I believe that we have to rediscover and exercise this aspect of ourselves if we&#x27;re to navigate the current crisis. (*) Our collective imagination lacks force at a time when generative Anti-Imagination is reaching industrial scale.<br><br><a href="/tags/ai/" rel="tag">#AI</a> <a href="/tags/genai/" rel="tag">#GenAI</a> <a href="/tags/generativeai/" rel="tag">#GenerativeAI</a> <a href="/tags/imagination/" rel="tag">#imagination</a> <a href="/tags/activeimagination/" rel="tag">#ActiveImagination</a><br><br>(*) &quot;Crisis&quot; has a medical definition: &quot;that change in a disease which indicates whether the result is to be recovery or death&quot; (Webster&#x27;s dictionary). Its Greek root can also mean &quot;decision&quot;, which I like to think about when considering &quot;crises&quot;. They are decisions that need to be made.<br>

<p>What if &quot;42&quot; is just the hallucination of an LLM from the future? 🤔</p><p><a href="/tags/llm/" rel="tag">#LLM</a> <a href="/tags/llms/" rel="tag">#LLMs</a> <a href="/tags/ai/" rel="tag">#AI</a> <a href="/tags/generativeai/" rel="tag">#generativeAI</a> <a href="/tags/42/" rel="tag">#42</a></p>

<p>Dear Mozilla what you&#x27;re doing is stupid, dangerous, and opposed to your mission. You need to stop. <a href="/tags/ai/" rel="tag">#ai</a> <a href="/tags/aibrowser/" rel="tag">#aibrowser</a> <a href="/tags/mozilla/" rel="tag">#mozilla</a> <a href="/tags/firefox/" rel="tag">#firefox</a> <a href="/tags/webbrowser/" rel="tag">#webbrowser</a></p><p><a href="https://gardinerbryant.com/mozilla-ai-in-the-browser-is-disgusting-please-stop/" rel="nofollow" class="ellipsis" title="gardinerbryant.com/mozilla-ai-in-the-browser-is-disgusting-please-stop/"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">gardinerbryant.com/mozilla-ai-</span><span class="invisible">in-the-browser-is-disgusting-please-stop/</span></a></p>

<p>&quot;Titled “Chatgpt induced psychosis,” the original post came from a 27-year-old teacher who explained that her partner was convinced that the popular OpenAI model “gives him the answers to the universe.”&quot;</p><p><a href="https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-features/ai-spiritual-delusions-destroying-human-relationships-1235330175/" rel="nofollow" class="ellipsis" title="www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-features/ai-spiritual-delusions-destroying-human-relationships-1235330175/"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">www.rollingstone.com/culture/c</span><span class="invisible">ulture-features/ai-spiritual-delusions-destroying-human-relationships-1235330175/</span></a></p><p><a href="/tags/news/" rel="tag">#news</a> <a href="/tags/technology/" rel="tag">#technology</a> <a href="/tags/technews/" rel="tag">#TechNews</a> <a href="/tags/ai/" rel="tag">#AI</a> <a href="/tags/chatgpt/" rel="tag">#ChatGPT</a></p>

<p>This definition of <a href="/tags/aislop/" rel="tag">#AISlop</a> popped out of my head after a bit of un-entrainment (if you dig). </p><p><a href="/tags/ai/" rel="tag">#AI</a> </p><p><a href="https://realityfragments.com/2026/02/01/a-definition-of-ai-slop/" rel="nofollow" class="ellipsis" title="realityfragments.com/2026/02/01/a-definition-of-ai-slop/"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">realityfragments.com/2026/02/0</span><span class="invisible">1/a-definition-of-ai-slop/</span></a></p>

<p>Outlook not so good 🎱</p><p>Police tech doesn’t predict crime. It predicts policing.</p><p>Based on biased data, it brings more of the same – racist policing and poverty punishment.</p><p>Read our latest blog on why crime &#x27;predicting&#x27; police tech must be BANNED ⬇️</p><p><a href="/tags/safetynotsurveillance/" rel="tag">#SafetyNotSurveillance</a></p><p><a href="https://www.openrightsgroup.org/blog/why-predictive-policing-must-be-banned/" rel="nofollow" class="ellipsis" title="www.openrightsgroup.org/blog/why-predictive-policing-must-be-banned/"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">www.openrightsgroup.org/blog/w</span><span class="invisible">hy-predictive-policing-must-be-banned/</span></a></p><p><a href="/tags/policing/" rel="tag">#policing</a> <a href="/tags/ai/" rel="tag">#AI</a> <a href="/tags/precrime/" rel="tag">#precrime</a> <a href="/tags/justice/" rel="tag">#justice</a> <a href="/tags/criminal/" rel="tag">#criminal</a> <a href="/tags/police/" rel="tag">#police</a> <a href="/tags/ukpol/" rel="tag">#ukpol</a> <a href="/tags/ukpolitics/" rel="tag">#ukpolitics</a> <a href="/tags/surveillance/" rel="tag">#surveillance</a></p>

<p>So if you thought that surveillance based ads couldn&#x27;t get any worse... Meta: Hold my beer!</p><p><a href="/tags/facebook/" rel="tag">#Facebook</a> <a href="/tags/meta/" rel="tag">#Meta</a> <a href="/tags/surveillance/" rel="tag">#surveillance</a> <a href="/tags/ai/" rel="tag">#AI</a> <a href="/tags/llm/" rel="tag">#LLM</a> <a href="/tags/ads/" rel="tag">#Ads</a> </p><p><a href="https://techcrunch.com/2025/05/07/mark-zuckerbergs-ai-ad-tool-sounds-like-a-social-media-nightmare/?utm_campaign=social&amp;utm_source=threads&amp;utm_medium=organic" rel="nofollow" class="ellipsis" title="techcrunch.com/2025/05/07/mark-zuckerbergs-ai-ad-tool-sounds-like-a-social-media-nightmare/?utm_campaign=social&amp;utm_source=threads&amp;utm_medium=organic"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">techcrunch.com/2025/05/07/mark</span><span class="invisible">-zuckerbergs-ai-ad-tool-sounds-like-a-social-media-nightmare/?utm_campaign=social&amp;utm_source=threads&amp;utm_medium=organic</span></a></p>

<p>WSJ: Zuckerberg&#x27;s Grand Vision: Most of Your Friends Will Be AI</p><p>🙄 😬 </p><p><a href="/tags/ai/" rel="tag">#AI</a> <a href="/tags/techbros/" rel="tag">#techbros</a></p>

<p>&quot;When you see someone who looks like Agatha Christie and talks like Agatha Christie, I think it’s easy for the boundaries to be blurred. What do we gain? Other than it being gimmicky?&quot;</p><p><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/08/world/europe/agatha-christie-ai-class-bbc.html?unlocked_article_code=1.Fk8.DdPe.r664dkMONRKu&amp;smid=url-share" rel="nofollow" class="ellipsis" title="www.nytimes.com/2025/05/08/world/europe/agatha-christie-ai-class-bbc.html?unlocked_article_code=1.Fk8.DdPe.r664dkMONRKu&amp;smid=url-share"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">www.nytimes.com/2025/05/08/wor</span><span class="invisible">ld/europe/agatha-christie-ai-class-bbc.html?unlocked_article_code=1.Fk8.DdPe.r664dkMONRKu&amp;smid=url-share</span></a></p><p><a href="/tags/news/" rel="tag">#news</a> <a href="/tags/technews/" rel="tag">#TechNews</a> <a href="/tags/technology/" rel="tag">#technology</a> <a href="/tags/ai/" rel="tag">#AI</a></p>

<p>&quot;We won 3 Supreme Court seats Tuesday. We won the Bucks County, PA, DA&#x27;s race. No biggie, Dems have won it before. In 1891.</p><p>So went PA, which Fetterman betrayed days later. Fetterman&#x27;s the guy you thought was when you first looked at him<br><a href="https://www.blueamp.co/p/schumer-and-eight-senate-democratic" rel="nofollow" class="ellipsis" title="www.blueamp.co/p/schumer-and-eight-senate-democratic"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">www.blueamp.co/p/schumer-and-e</span><span class="invisible">ight-senate-democratic</span></a> <a href="/tags/trump/" rel="tag">#trump</a> <a href="/tags/news/" rel="tag">#news</a> <a href="/tags/politiics/" rel="tag">#politiics</a> <a href="/tags/shutdown/" rel="tag">#shutdown</a> <a href="/tags/ai/" rel="tag">#ai</a> <a href="/tags/tv/" rel="tag">#tv</a> <a href="/tags/media/" rel="tag">#media</a> <a href="/tags/press/" rel="tag">#press</a> <a href="/tags/tech/" rel="tag">#tech</a> <a href="/tags/democrats/" rel="tag">#democrats</a> <a href="/tags/donaldtrump/" rel="tag">#donaldtrump</a> <a href="/tags/snap/" rel="tag">#snap</a> <a href="/tags/healthcare/" rel="tag">#healthcare</a> <a href="/tags/eu/" rel="tag">#eu</a></p>

<p>NEW SUBSTACK: Go Read The Rest Don&#x27;t Forget To SUBSCRIBE: <a href="https://www.blueamp.co/p/end-stage-democracy-has-a-mascot" rel="nofollow" class="ellipsis" title="www.blueamp.co/p/end-stage-democracy-has-a-mascot"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">www.blueamp.co/p/end-stage-dem</span><span class="invisible">ocracy-has-a-mascot</span></a> </p><p>&quot;And now, we’ve arrived at the logical conclusion of all this—Eric <a href="/tags/trump/" rel="tag">#Trump</a>, the barking embodiment of dumb-son nepotism. A laughable lout with inherited intellectual necrosis and the empathy of a Terminator wrapped in designer smugness.</p><p>In Eric we have the heir to a <a href="/tags/political/" rel="tag">#political</a> dynasty so corrupt it saddens Tammany Hall, b/c they’re not here to stand and clap. A guy whose gums allow you to shelter-in-place during EF4 tornadoes. Whose existence makes it so when you say the “the dumb Trump son,” you’re somehow not talking about Don Jr.&quot; </p><p><a href="/tags/news/" rel="tag">#news</a> <a href="/tags/politics/" rel="tag">#politics</a> <a href="/tags/donaldtrump/" rel="tag">#donaldtrump</a> <a href="/tags/tech/" rel="tag">#tech</a> <a href="/tags/media/" rel="tag">#media</a> <a href="/tags/press/" rel="tag">#press</a> <a href="/tags/washington/" rel="tag">#washington</a> <a href="/tags/maga/" rel="tag">#maga</a> <a href="/tags/ai/" rel="tag">#ai</a> <a href="/tags/usa/" rel="tag">#usa</a> <a href="/tags/us/" rel="tag">#us</a> <a href="/tags/unitedstates/" rel="tag">#unitedstates</a> <a href="/tags/america/" rel="tag">#america</a> <a href="/tags/russia/" rel="tag">#russia</a> <a href="/tags/ukraine/" rel="tag">#ukraine</a> <a href="/tags/china/" rel="tag">#china</a> <a href="/tags/eu/" rel="tag">#eu</a> <a href="/tags/tv/" rel="tag">#tv</a></p>

<p>&quot;A new report from Common Sense Media says that 72 percent of teens surveyed have used AI companions, and 33 percent have relationships or friendships with these chatbots.&quot;</p><p><a href="https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/teens-are-flocking-to-ai-chatbots-is-this-healthy/" rel="nofollow" class="ellipsis" title="www.scientificamerican.com/article/teens-are-flocking-to-ai-chatbots-is-this-healthy/"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">www.scientificamerican.com/art</span><span class="invisible">icle/teens-are-flocking-to-ai-chatbots-is-this-healthy/</span></a></p><p><a href="/tags/news/" rel="tag">#news</a> <a href="/tags/technews/" rel="tag">#TechNews</a> <a href="/tags/technology/" rel="tag">#technology</a> <a href="/tags/ai/" rel="tag">#AI</a></p>

<p>&quot;<a href="/tags/anthropic/" rel="tag">#Anthropic</a> Settles Major AI Copyright Suit Brought by Authors&quot;</p><p>Precedent set?<br>Both of my <a href="/tags/scarfolk/" rel="tag">#Scarfolk</a> books were downloaded and pirated from the LibGen &#x27;shadow library&#x27;.<br>Compensation would be nice. <br>Anyone aware of other class-action lawsuits I can join, or have any other legal pointers?</p><p><a href="https://news.bloomberglaw.com/class-action/anthropic-settles-major-ai-copyright-suit-brought-by-authors" rel="nofollow" class="ellipsis" title="news.bloomberglaw.com/class-action/anthropic-settles-major-ai-copyright-suit-brought-by-authors"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">news.bloomberglaw.com/class-ac</span><span class="invisible">tion/anthropic-settles-major-ai-copyright-suit-brought-by-authors</span></a></p><p><a href="/tags/ai/" rel="tag">#AI</a></p>

<p>Warning: Tim O&#x27;Reilly of O&#x27;Reilly Media now wants every human programmer to be replaced by Gen AI. Tim O&#x27;Reilly/company policy on book editing and writing went from &quot;avoid Gen AI&quot; to &quot;you must use Gen AI as much as possible, we will monitor you through KPIs to use it as much as possible. So avoid O&#x27;Reilly books. Support an indie author. Plenty of them out there who write and sell books. No need to support corporate overlords. Source <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1kimr4a/warning_tim_oreilly_of_oreilly_media_now_wants/" rel="nofollow" class="ellipsis" title="www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1kimr4a/warning_tim_oreilly_of_oreilly_media_now_wants/"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">www.reddit.com/r/programming/c</span><span class="invisible">omments/1kimr4a/warning_tim_oreilly_of_oreilly_media_now_wants/</span></a> <a href="/tags/ai/" rel="tag">#ai</a></p>