<p>用 <a href="/tags/geminicli/" rel="tag">#GeminiCLI</a> ，几乎耗尽了三个账户的免费 <a href="/tags/gemini/" rel="tag">#Gemini</a> API配额，OCR出来了秦晖的《 <a href="/tags/拯救民主/" rel="tag">#拯救民主</a> 》。虽然还不完美，不过也很接近了。</p>
gemini
<p><a href="/tags/geminicli/" rel="tag">#GeminiCLI</a> 始终认为自己用的模型是 <a href="/tags/gemini/" rel="tag">#Gemini</a> 1.5。</p>
<p><a href="/tags/gemini/" rel="tag">#Gemini</a> 2.5 Pro绝对是跟 <a href="/tags/gpt/" rel="tag">#GPT</a>-4.5、 <a href="/tags/grok/" rel="tag">#Grok</a>-3一个级别的，能领会你的想法，能悟出你没说出来的那些意思。</p>
Here's my half-baked deep thought of the day.<br><br>The culture industry is in the business of producing "culture" and distributing it, unidirectionally, to consumers of culture (think movies, TV shows, albums, books). We had a brief respite with the internet and social media, which are bidirectional and therefore interactive, as companies experimented with co-opting user content for use in cultural products. That period looks to be ending now, and companies are back to the business of unidirectionally firing cultural products at us. Since they never really figured out how to turn what the masses produce towards their ends without incurring significant costs, they are instead opting to fill the internet with generative AI output, which they can control and manipulate, and whose costs are the "better" kinds of costs (labor costs to hire content moderators, even contractors, are far worse to e.g. Wall Street than capital expenditures for servers or, even better, rental costs for cloud services).<br><br>The fact that Google took a perfectly good and functional internet search engine that lots of people liked and started turning it into an AI slop generator makes more sense, at least to me, when viewed through this lens. Google's search engine was never really a search engine. It was always a cultural artifact, complete with "commercials" (ads), with web page creators as producers. At some point Google calculated that using an in-house generative AI to produce the content for this artifact made more sense, so they started experimenting with it.<br><br><a href="/tags/ai/" rel="tag">#AI</a> <a href="/tags/genai/" rel="tag">#GenAI</a> <a href="/tags/generativeai/" rel="tag">#GenerativeAI</a> <a href="/tags/google/" rel="tag">#Google</a> <a href="/tags/gemini/" rel="tag">#Gemini</a> <a href="/tags/culture/" rel="tag">#culture</a> <a href="/tags/cultureindustry/" rel="tag">#CultureIndustry</a><br>
"AI" is Google's "pivot to video" moment:<br><br>Google AI Search Shift Leaves Website Makers Feeling ‘Betrayed’<br><p>The now-ubiquitous AI-generated answers — and the way Google has changed its search algorithm to support them — have caused traffic to independent websites to plummet, according to Bloomberg interviews with 25 publishers and people who work with them.<br></p>From <a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-04-07/google-ai-search-shift-leaves-website-makers-feeling-betrayed" rel="nofollow" class="ellipsis" title="www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-04-07/google-ai-search-shift-leaves-website-makers-feeling-betrayed"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">www.bloomberg.com/news/article</span><span class="invisible">s/2025-04-07/google-ai-search-shift-leaves-website-makers-feeling-betrayed</span></a><br><br>Remember when Facebook told everyone they should change all their content to video, because it got more traffic? And then that turned out to be such a blatant falsehood that companies went bankrupt trying to do this?<br><br><a href="/tags/ai/" rel="tag">#AI</a> <a href="/tags/genai/" rel="tag">#GenAI</a> <a href="/tags/generativeai/" rel="tag">#GenerativeAI</a> <a href="/tags/llm/" rel="tag">#LLM</a> <a href="/tags/google/" rel="tag">#Google</a> <a href="/tags/gemini/" rel="tag">#Gemini</a> <a href="/tags/aislop/" rel="tag">#AISlop</a><br>
Edited 354d ago
<p><a href="/tags/gemma/" rel="tag">#Gemma</a>-3n-E4B-it(2025-6-26)在小米14(8Gen3, 16GB RAM)上流畅运行，表现和 <a href="/tags/gpt/" rel="tag">#GPT</a>-4 Turbo(2024-04-09)、<a href="/tags/gemini/" rel="tag">#Gemini</a> 1.5 Pro (2024-2-15）、<a href="/tags/claude/" rel="tag">#Claude</a> 3 Opus(20240229)这些16个月前的旗舰一个级别。<br><a href="https://lmarena.ai/leaderboard/text" rel="nofollow"><span class="invisible">https://</span>lmarena.ai/leaderboard/text</a></p>
Edited 195d ago
<p>按以前的尿性，gemini-2.5-flash-preview-09-2025就是 <a href="/tags/gemini/" rel="tag">#Gemini</a> 3.0的前身了。</p>
Edited 191d ago
<p><a href="/tags/gemini/" rel="tag">#Gemini</a> <a href="/tags/deepresearch/" rel="tag">#DeepResearch</a> 悄悄地消失了。</p>
Edited 62d ago
<p>6 个 AI，每人 10000 美金，自主决策交易，谁最能挣钱？</p><p><a href="/tags/deepseek/" rel="tag">#deepseek</a> <br><a href="/tags/chatgpt/" rel="tag">#chatgpt</a> <br><a href="/tags/claude/" rel="tag">#claude</a> <br><a href="/tags/qwen/" rel="tag">#qwen</a> <br><a href="/tags/gemini/" rel="tag">#Gemini</a> <br><a href="/tags/grok/" rel="tag">#grok</a> </p><p>以上6位选手参赛，网站实时直播，DeepSeek 一直处于领先地位，目前排在第一位，已经挣了3000美金了。</p><p>Gemini垫底，ChatGPT 倒数第二 <img src="https://neodb.social/media/emoji/techhub.social/0040.png" class="emoji" alt=":0040:" title=":0040:"> <img src="https://neodb.social/media/emoji/techhub.social/0040.png" class="emoji" alt=":0040:" title=":0040:"> </p><p>实时围观地址：<a href="https://nof1.ai/" rel="nofollow"><span class="invisible">https://</span>nof1.ai/</a></p><p><a href="/tags/1link1day/" rel="tag">#1link1day</a></p>
<p>I used to say I live my life a quarter mile at a time and I think that's why we were brothers - because you did too. No matter where you are, whether it's a quarter mile away or half way across the world. The most important thing in life will always be the people in this room, right here, right now. Salute mi familia. You'll always be with me. And you'll always be my brother.</p><p>Dominic Torreto</p><p>Image is AI generated by <a href="/tags/gemini/" rel="tag">#Gemini</a></p>
Edited 55d ago
<p>A large international study coordinated by the <a href="/tags/ebu/" rel="tag">#EBU</a> and led by the <a href="/tags/bbc/" rel="tag">#BBC</a> found that AI assistants misrepresent news content 45% of the time across different languages and platforms, with <a href="/tags/gemini/" rel="tag">#Gemini</a> performing the worst.</p><p>[…] Key findings: </p><p>• 45% of all AI answers had at least one significant issue.<br>• 31% of responses showed serious sourcing problems – missing, misleading, or incorrect attributions.<br>• 20% contained major accuracy issues, including hallucinated details and outdated information.<br>• Gemini performed worst with significant issues in 76% of responses, more than double the other assistants, largely due to its poor sourcing performance.<br>• Comparison between the BBC’s results earlier this year and this study show some improvements but still high levels of errors.</p><p><a href="https://www.bbc.co.uk/mediacentre/2025/new-ebu-research-ai-assistants-news-content" rel="nofollow" class="ellipsis" title="www.bbc.co.uk/mediacentre/2025/new-ebu-research-ai-assistants-news-content"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">www.bbc.co.uk/mediacentre/2025</span><span class="invisible">/new-ebu-research-ai-assistants-news-content</span></a></p><p><a href="/tags/aihype/" rel="tag">#aihype</a> <a href="/tags/llm/" rel="tag">#llm</a> <a href="/tags/openai/" rel="tag">#openai</a> <a href="/tags/perplexity/" rel="tag">#perplexity</a> <a href="/tags/chatgpt/" rel="tag">#chatgpt</a></p>