#Mythos finds a #curl vulnerability
yes, as in singular one.
https://daniel.haxx.se/blog/2026/05/11/mythos-finds-a-curl-vulnerability/
mythos
#Mythos
听炸叔讲到了厄洛斯和普赛克的故事，感觉这不是灰姑娘加上美女与野兽吗？然后又想到了那篇EC文9-11-10…9-11-10真的是读完就再也忘不掉了…
More breathless, but vague praise for #Mythos. Now #mozilla's CTO has come out with a detail-free, hyperbole-laden blog post.
I can't get anything below the surface level on this blog post. Maybe I'm looking in the wrong places.
The blog post itself contains no links or references (except a link to a prior blog post)
The Firefox 150 release notes has zero mentions of #Claude, #Anthropic, or Mythos.
The security advisories in Firefox 150 lists 41 bugs
Anthropic is credited exactly 3 times.
The blog post says This week’s release of Firefox 150 includes fixes for 271 vulnerabilities identified during this initial evaluation
it is not clear why the blog says 271, the release lists 41 issues, and only 3 acknowledge Anthropic
I've tried looking on Mozilla's bugzilla and I have no access to any bug that is named in those release notes. I can't even see the conversation, much less the code change.
How is someone supposed to put this blog post's claims into context?