Nomadische Identität = magic! 🙂
#hubzilla #fediverse #nomad
Existing implementations of Conversation Containers (#Streams and #Hubzilla) add a context property to top-level posts of conversations. This is also what FEP-171b currently prescribes.
However, as I noted in the FEP, this is not consistent with FEP-7888 recommendations.
context property is supposed to be used for grouping objects, and in Conversation Containers we have a collection of conversation activities, not posts.
A property that links top-level post to its conversation container should be called differently. For example, threadContext or conversationContext
Note.threadContext == Add.target.id
context can still be used, but for linking to the collection of posts (although I would prefer to use thread for that purpose).
A post to traverse the Fediverse & beyond 
Third time's a charm: This post can be seen with #Mastodon, #Bluesky, #Sharkey, #Mbin, #Lemmy, #Friendica, #Hubzilla, #Hometown, #Akkoma & more.
Please share it wherever you see it in the #Fediverse
I know a lot of you still think of the #Fediverse as just “Mastodon”.
But it’s far more than that. There’s an entire ecosystem of federated message boards that’s already proven popular: #Piefed, #NodeBB, #Lemmy, #Mbin, and #Discourse.
Even the classics like #Friendica and #Hubzilla have solid forum features baked in.
If you’re only here for the microblogging, you’re missing a key piece. Communities built around interests are something #Twitter never offered, and #Bluesky still doesn’t.
So if you’re looking to replace your #Facebook Groups, the Fediverse already has you covered.
#Mastadon is trying to be #Twitter, but I'm not a Twitter person, and need better options to digest/navigate my incoming Feed.
So I'm thinking about some decent #activitypub based alternatives.
how Mitra social compares vs (streams) ? (summoning @silverpill & #hubzilla avatar astral projection guy, I forgot his name)
Or what should I know about #pleroma #akkoma #Misskey #lemmy , before investing in them ?
Private groups
Lately, I've been seeing various people claiming that fediverse doesn't have private groups. They often point to some task force at w3c that is supposedly working to fill the gap.
However, fediverse has had private groups for a very long time:
- Hubzilla channels. This project probably had private groups before ActivityPub. The implementation was later adapted for ActivityPub and refined in subsequent forks, Streams and Forte. It is now partially documented in FEP-171b: Conversation Containers.
- Smithereen groups. This implementation is documented in FEP-400e: Publicly-appendable ActivityPub collections (published in 2021) and FEP-db0e: Authentication mechanism for non-public groups.
- Lemmy communities. Private groups were proposed in Lemmy RFC 0005 and have been implemented in the development version. There is a test instance running this version (Lemmy v1.0b) at https://voyager.lemmy.ml/
There are probably other implementations that I am not aware of.
Someone is starting a Hubzilla managed hosting.
They also have this: https://atmosphere.social
I sure hope it's legit. 😆😅
(Hat tip to: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:6i6n57nrkq6xavqbdo6bvkqr/post/3mcvgdyohkk2i )
J'aime bien aussi les annuaire des sites #hubzilla et site de la famille